Monday, June 18, 2012

Long Live The Girls

Being an Indian, lets begin with India. She is unfathomable to the extent that it requires a Sorcerer's ball to unfold the mysterious twists and turns it offers to the observers gasping in awe. Few countries (other than the sub continent ones) would vie for the most eclectic and eccentric practices followed with such gusto- least being imaginable- for the acts are inhumanely ghastly and grotesque in nature.


Who in the world would commit a murder of their own offspring- not once or twice but till its born with a stick to poke around.

Over the years this crime of selective de-pregnation has maimed the unborn voices of hundreds of thousands across this so-venerated a land of one of the most ancient civilizations. The inflated/deflated Governmental databases throw a sorry figure and it pinches more when they declare with camouflaged apathy: a falling ratio in the last two decades- does it sets the alarm bells ringing!!!! Well, if no- here comes a true conversational epoch that took place not very long ago.

There was a conversation between two friends regarding marriage- not a debate but on the highs and lows of  arranged marriage (a practised custom in India where marital bells jingle by the most active participation of the parents/relatives rather than the gentleman and the lady).  Points of discussion were:


  • A lot of investigations must be made prior to in order to unearth hidden skeletons in the closet, if any, by both the sides.
  • Understanding each other (including the ifs and buts) as well as the families.
  • Lots of selections at hand to choose from (applicable to both sides). Here the ratio is skewed in an altogether different manner.
  • Unnecessary expenses at every nodal point of progress.
  • Finally, the biggest risk-ful adventure(mis-) of one's life (Still marriage is regarded as the union of social values; though the number of divorce cases are on the rise, somehow the adjustments and reconciliations play a much bigger role and the social fabric remains intact- a big joke where womanhood suffers on a daily basis in a cruel way).
One of the friends was a genuine stickler of brains, brawn(in sports), humility and more such qualities of desire. The other was a romantic of nature.  These two guys and a host of their other friends considered studies as the biggest challenge- though other challenges did exist in the form of sports, adda sessions (the state of West Bengal is popular for gossip sessions over tea, biscuits and other such local delicacies), friendship (minus girls in most of the cases) and booze as well in some (lets agree on more) cases. While some of their other friends who diligently broke into the other part of the friendship (plus girls in most of the cases) did manage to hold the hands of the fairer sex and enjoyed a part of life which these poor fellows missed and would never be able to turn the time for a chance come whatever. The issues that pop their heads out could be summarized as:
  1. Did they not manage to hold hands because of their (mis)adventurous lifestyle?
  2. The custom of having a girlfriend(s) was still in its nascent stage!
  3. There were few good-looking girls in their circle of reach/observation/expectancy!
  4. There were not enough girls to cope up with the demand (it is purely a demand-supply mismatch statement and not a rhetoric at all, no need for the pro-woman groups to batter me for this statement!!).
Somehow, all the factors do manage to garner a swish of vote against their notions but primarily it's the paucity of girls ( good-looking is a vague concept that I reject uprightly: Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder- courtesy Mr.John Keats). Sins committed by our previous generations have yielded forms so thick and fast- where do our sins would take the coming generation (if any)???? 

We all- specially the government- are on the big watch out for tigers, trees and other such hotly contested extincting beings (or things- considering the way they are used!!) but we do care least about "if girls become extinct species"- ohh!!! my neurons would not support channelizing this thought process to others for the fear of fatal hormonal imbalance......

Let us make this country a one-for-all. For every boy there shall be a girl-  1:1.

Long live the girls.............


[N.B.: The brainy friend confessed that though studies are the biggest pushers in life, one should not neglect the godly creations- must admire it to the core when it is proper to do, as I put it in again time can't be brought back.

One of the characters is my dear friend Animesh.]


7 comments:

  1. Lots of guys not finding a suitable match for themselves is an interesting way of looking at the problem of female-foeticide (Although it still sounds like a bit biased thought pondered upon from a guy's perspective). The point is its a horrendous act and it should be treated as a murder of a human life. [A lot of things are coming into my mind but I will save it for later... and thanks for the praises: I don't think I qualify for all of them]

    ReplyDelete
  2. No point in praising...A spade must be called a spade...If we are able to clarify the masses through a roundabout way, let it be....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very verbose Premanshu and much well thought-out.... On a lighter side, when u see Mika also has girlfriend (infact 2 girl-friends), one wud tend to believe that the problem is other way around :-D :-D.... But truth be told, we as a society is no better than a stupid circus

    ReplyDelete
  4. On a lighter side: mika having 2 would definitely be seen as a ray of hope for those having none....over trumps shall never be ruled out...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Prem,

    Two not so related topics under a single banner – and both got a common ground in girls; ah..!

    It still is a shame that despite our towering neo liberal development claims Indians as a society prefer boys. Even all those who sermonise public about the vices of selective abortions and significance of a balanced sex ratio, in their most private lives they prefer BOYS. The extra social and economic costs associated with bringing up a girl child sure is the villain. South Asian prejudices of millennia and modern middle class egos fuel the case. The most intriguing part of the tale is that female foeticide in India is rising among middle and high income households and not in the lower strata.

    Census data (2011) reflects that in the last one decade sex ratio in India has, in fact risen (933 to 940). But one should not fail to notice that child sex ratio (0-6) has fallen at the same time. It slipped from 927 (in 2001) to 914 (in 2011). What does it mean? – over all female population in the country increased, thanks to better health care facilities and awareness. However the number of female kids in the age bracket of 0-6 has dangerously fallen down which itself is worrisome. Historically notorious states like Punjab, Haryana and Rajastan have improved their performances thanks to the base effect. But the malice of female foeticide has spread to hitherto unsuspected areas as the fertility rate has dwindled and standard of living improvised (eg. Maharashtra - esp. Mumbai).

    Is it not the chemistry of love often weird to decipher? It springs up for the least expected that too at the most unpredictable of moments.
    So hold on, wait for your hour and be open :)

    Regarding arranged marriages - it is high time the Indian middle class abandoned this obsession with 'status' within marriages. Many a time youngsters fail to realise their nuptial dreams due to unprecedented objection from family; on what - silly grounds like caste, religion or family money. The act of marriage does not mean to solemnise the union of societal status of two families, it intends to converge the dreams and desires of two individuals and their extended family.
    Let us live up to the expectations of the third millennium and be the catalysts for real change.

    Keep writing and mull more of your thoughts.

    Cheers,
    Arjun

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks a lot Arjun for providing the impetus in the form of data and more clarity on the picture....A hypothetical situation I created .... Say the world is at its supposed end and there our dear Mr. Noah is busy preparing his Ark...

    Now there are two choices...Either he can take up 10 men and 1 woman or 10 women and 1 man...According to the first choice: the next baby would bloom on earth only after 9 months while as per the second choice 10 babies would flower the earth in the same time..This by no means shall be considered as championing the cause of polygamy....

    Thanks again Arjun....Its the cities that breed the creatures of the worst waters...

    ReplyDelete
  7. One woman must take care of ten men, I should say - advocacy for polyandry .. hehe.. :)

    From a conversation between the sufi mystics Rabia Basri and Hasan Basri :-

    Rabia: "How did Allah divide intellect among humans?"
    "Intellect was split into ten parts", Hasan said, "of which nine was given to Man and one to Woman".
    "Ok, Then how did he share the human libido?" Rabia asked again.
    "Libido too was divided into ten of which nine was given to Woman; Man was left with a single part of it"
    Rabia: "Perfect, that makes sense - Man with his nine part intellect still could not win over his single share of sexual desires. At the same time Woman with a singular share of intellect successfully constraints her nine desires. This is the unique quality of feminine character"

    --Arjun

    ReplyDelete